Political Conflict in Zimbabwe a cause of concern; worsens public suffering

By Fr. Limukani Ndlovu

Political conflict is an undesirable energy generated whenever political parties compete for incompatible objectives all for the sake of controlling public opinion. Without evading the present political reality in a theological and spiritual speculation which could serve as an escape from concrete historical responsibility (Africea Munus #17), the dog-eat-dog politics in Zimbabwe is a cause of concern as it continues to tear the nation apart. Political conflict does not bring anything good on the table but simply exacerbates public suffering and the perpetuation of hatred and generational poverty.

As part of her social teaching, the Church does not condone every possible form of social conflict. As such the recurring political conflicts cannot be glorified as heroic acts in a multi-party democratic society. As noted at the XIV Ordinary General Assembly on the Vocation and Mission of the Family in the Church and in the Contemporary World, dealing with delicacy and respect means attending to wounds and restoring hope and to rekindle trust in the other. Political tenderness serves to overcome conflicts and disagreements (# 88).

Politics should aim at the betterment of people across the political divide. It should leave citizens free to make choices of their destiny and leadership at any given time. In a country where election mood seems to be the order of the day, there is need to promote tolerance and political maturity among political parties and their constituencies. Political parties should invest energy in clarifying and publicizing their ideologies and policies. They should resolve problems rather than engaging in political conflicts, coercion, deception, extortion, intimidation and violence. Pope Francis warns, that inequality and lack of integral human development make peace impossible and that without equal opportunities, different forms of aggression and conflict will find a fertile terrain for growth and eventually explode (Fratteli Tutti #235).

Political maturity calls for authentic and genuine communication of ideas rather than mere politicking and sloganeering. Under the interest-based approach, it means putting a political party’s manifesto on the table and leave it to the electorate to make uninfluenced choices trusting and hoping that all that is promised will be delivered. In the spirit of synodality, political groupings should engage in mutual dialogue, especially where people have been engaged in long-lasting, deep-rooted conflicts. And so, they will pursue reconciliation and visible development.

Political conflict does not yield any positive results but takes people’s attention from more important issues. It undermines the dignity and respect of human life. It demoralizes and sharpens division leading to irreconcilable differences in communities. It leads to irresponsibility and ultimately a polarized people and yet as Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI puts it, reconciliation is a pre-political concept and a pre-political reality, and for this very reason it is of greatest importance for the task of politics itself (Africae Munus # 19).

It is incumbent upon every citizen to overcome political conflict which is a social ill and a scandal especially when Christians perpetrate it. Political freedoms and fundamental rights to associate have to be respected and guaranteed by the state. No one should be made to feel less entitled than others. No one should be reduced to second class citizen because of their political choices for every society benefits when each person and social group feels truly at home. No one should feel excluded on account of political differences. If only we could view our political opponents in the same way that we view our children or our spouse, mother or father!” (Fratteli Tutti # 230).

One thought on “Political Conflict in Zimbabwe a cause of concern; worsens public suffering

  1. Thank you P. Limukani. It is very interesting to interrogate how politics is shaping our society and most importantly how it is affecting our progress and development as a people. However it is critical to note that when dealing with political conflict, parties are naturally confrontative and some violent, hence it is also critical for other a-political institutions to be involved, either in shaping the truths and advancing the hopes of the people. And with this in mind, we can not talk about how political conflict is bad without also turning to how the Church is letting such things slide, we may also want to interrogate the role os such social institutions.
    You rightly quoted, that “dealing with delicacy and respect means attending to wounds and restoring hope and to rekindle trust in the other,” can social institutions such as the Church, Roman Catholic and others be involved in forming and shaping the way our politics is played, political actors or be involved in the political processes, of cz not as a party by in a way to avoid the effects of political conflict? “Political tenderness serves to overcome conflicts and disagreements (# 88)” and in the current context, what shall a society do to reform itself out of the toxic polarisation we find ourselves in?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s